Before I tackle the issues individually--and allow me to say that I do agree with some of their positions, some of their reasoning, and some of their suggestions--I want to complain about their methodology.  They allege that they are taking a survey, to determine the opinions of "netizens".  But each page of their survey contains a biased discussion of the issue, stating why the law should be accepted.  In every case, the issue is open for debate (they admit this), but C-Net fails to give the arguments against its suggestions, or to recommend a source for a contrary opinion (although I have given them the opportunity to prove their lack of bias by recommending this site to the many who subscribe to their newsletter--of which I am one).  It is prima facie obvious that if in taking a poll you give the subjects the major arguments on one side of the issue, and not on the other side, before asking their opinion, you will bias your survey in favor of your own position.  Political polls are taken by experts who understand that even so little as the way a question is phrased can control the outcome of a survey--what you ask and how you ask it will control your results far more than the opinions of those surveyed.  For example, on the issue of abortion, people have opinions on several levels.  Most people believe that abortion is morally wrong; this opinion is more common among conservatives, but stretches into liberal ranks significantly.  However, conservatives generally also believe that government should not try to control the lives of individuals:  "the government which governs least governs best".  So if you ask people whether abortion is wrong, the majority will say it is; but if you ask if government should limit abortion, the answer will usually be no.  And if so small a thing as the difference between whether something is wrong and whether it should be illegal can produce so great a difference, how much more bias will be injected into a survey by arguing one side of the issue before asking the question?  C-Net's survey is biased in its structure, and therefore biased in its results.

  I will repeat this point:  if C-Net presents its survey as support for its legislative recommendations, the survey results are biased due to the bias in the structure of the poll, and should be discounted.  You are welcome to make your views known to C-Net--the link is below--but I'm going to invite you to read my thoughts on their questions first--each of their recommendations discussed on a separate linked page.